Is the HS interface capable for M.2? Ed

This way mounting modules is much more robust than PMOD. Edmund Humenberger <edmund@...> schrieb am So., 21. Juli 2019, 16:23:

You want to have a pressfit distance so that you can screwmount the modules. Also on the carrier board you want to have "Muttern" oressfitted into it to ease the mounting. Very much like M.2 mounting

indeed :) this adapter was done during early feasibility study This is just 1:1 adapter fully passive, it is a bit speial as the PMOD connector will be lying flat on the BASEBOARD, and any connected

https://www.sparkfun.com/qwiic https://www.crowdsupply.com/steiert-solutions/qwiikit

To ease transition, a cruvi2PMOD adapter would be needed.

its on the TODO list already, I have latest KiCad installed too, and reading about kicad library standard.. plan is that all eagle-kicad project that are open source should link to cadlab.io for easy

How about designing a carrierboard with this module https://shop.trenz-electronic.de/de/TE0713-02-200-2C-FPGA-Modul-mit-Xilinx-Artix-7-XC7A200T-2FBG484C-4-x-5-cm-1-GByte-DDR3L?c=457 and some cruvi

MIPI-CSI (RASPI cam?) MIPI-DSI HS-1 GiG Ethernet LS-parallel camera HS-JESD204B AD HS-JESD204B DA LS-parallel transceiver (SX1257 PMOD)

its on the bottom :) https://www.digikey.com.au/product-detail/en/hirose-electric-co-ltd/DF12-30DS-0.5V-86/H5215CT-ND/948728 well, gregs feather could be converted to cruvi using this connector.. its

Greg added this high speed connector to his Feather, but I dont know if it would be possible to wire it up to the adapter. https://twitter.com/GregDavill/status/115180597056299417670562994176

yes, I probably should have made the doc in google in the first place, right now it is in the office format https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1z91rHqIBLRua9_ioNj3Ma6OR9cHTjNSx?usp=sharing There

I suggest to have a google Doc document (written and made available by Antti) where people can add their comments to the standard document. ed

I2C, RX/TX, SCK,MISO,MOSI - map 1:1, but to where connect SPI select on feather? or have lots of solder jumpers? This adapter if done "full passive" would be really easy to-do, and it would allow also

so true - you actually have to have it "in your hands" ... doing schematic and and looking PCB in 3D is not sufficient. lots of designs for first hardware "round" are being prepared already, but we

yes, this one of the first "ecosystem" adapters to be targeted: There are possible at least 4 adapters for Click-to-CRUVI needed 1) S size PASSIVE to CRUVI LS this is just wired, it maps very well,

so the concept so far: 1) all modules with the high speed connector fitted are pretty much forced to include ID EEPROM, also the I2C bus on the HS connector is really pretty much mandatory as

Is a widely used system with lots of modules. https://www.mikroe.com/click

would be great to have a design to download. ed

I think for now the next logical step would be to make a prototpye and send out some prototypes to the relevant parties. you can think about something to a certain extent, but then you need to touch